Discover What 'Doing It On Purpose' Certainty Really Means

You're sitting at the dinner table, and it's happening again.

Your daughter makes that sound while eating. Or she's got that clingy, pawing thing going with your partner. Or she's looking right at you while doing the exact behavior you've asked her not to do a hundred times.

And in that moment, you're not just annoyed. You're certain.

She's doing this on purpose. She knows exactly what she's doing. She's intelligent-you see it in everything else she does-so this? This is a choice. She's manipulating the situation, playing you and your partner against each other, and honestly, why isn't your partner backing you up on this?

The anger you feel doesn't just tell you something's wrong. It tells you you're right.

But here's what most parents don't realize about that feeling of righteous certainty: it's not clarity. It's a specific type of cognitive distortion that research shows actually predicts harsher parenting, damaged parent-child relationships, and-ironically-the exact behavior problems you're trying to prevent.

Why Anger-Fueled Certainty Isn't Clarity

When you're angry, your brain does something fascinating and dangerous: it creates an overwhelming sense that your interpretation of events is correct.

One parent described it perfectly: "I just feel so angry when it happens, and in that moment, I'm absolutely convinced she's being manipulative. The anger makes me feel certain I'm seeing it correctly."

This isn't a character flaw. It's how anger works as an emotion. Research on anger and cognition shows that anger generates what psychologists call a "moving against" action tendency-you're primed to oppose, to fight, to prove you're right. And that psychological state comes packaged with an intense feeling of righteousness.

The problem? That certainty isn't based on better perception. It's based on narrower perception.

Think of anger like a spotlight in a dark room. It illuminates one thing brilliantly-the behavior you're focused on, the interpretation you're locked onto-while casting everything else into deeper shadow. The things in the shadows? Your child's actual developmental capacity. Their emotional state. Your own contribution to the dynamic. Alternative explanations for what you're seeing.

What you wrote in your homework is more accurate than you might have realized: "Anger creates a belief of being right while creating blind spots."

So what's in those blind spots during tense mealtimes with your daughter?

What Nobody Tells You About 'She's Doing It On Purpose'

When your daughter exhibits difficult behaviors during meals-the sounds, the clinging to your partner, the seemingly deliberate defiance-you immediately blame her intentionality.

She's doing it on purpose.
She knows what she's doing.
She's very intelligent, so this is a choice.

This explanation feels airtight. After all, you can see the intelligence in other areas. You notice she looks right at you sometimes when she does it. The behavior happens at specific times, in specific patterns.

But here's the critical question that shifts everything: How developed is a young child's capacity to think multiple steps ahead like that?

To think: "If I do X, Mom will feel Y, and that will accomplish Z for me."

To deliberately engineer a situation where she "splits" her parents by strategically displaying certain behaviors at certain times.

That level of social manipulation requires what developmental psychologists call theory of mind-the ability to understand that other people have mental states, and to predict how your actions will affect those mental states. Research shows that this capacity develops progressively with age. Young children simply don't have the cognitive architecture for the level of intentional manipulation you're attributing to your daughter.

What looks like purposeful behavior is usually something much simpler: a developmentally normal response to what she's experiencing in the moment.

And here's where the research gets uncomfortable: Studies on parental attributions consistently show that when parents attribute intentional misbehavior to young children, it predicts more negative parental emotions, harsher parenting responses, and ongoing damage to the parent-child relationship quality over time.

In other words, the thought pattern itself-"she's doing it on purpose"-is maintaining and worsening the very cycle you're trying to break.

The real cause isn't your daughter's manipulation.

It's an attribution error, amplified by anger-induced certainty, creating a self-reinforcing loop:

You interpret behavior as intentional → This triggers anger → Anger creates certainty you're right → Certainty prevents you from seeing alternative explanations → You respond with rigidity → Daughter experiences tension → She moves toward your partner's calm → This looks like "choosing" and "splitting" → Confirms your original interpretation → More anger.

Round and round.

The Truth About That 'Manipulative' Behavior

Let's look at the specific thing that feels most intentional: your daughter's "clawing tendency" toward your partner during mealtimes.

You see her move toward your partner. You see her avoid you. Sometimes she looks right at you while doing it. It feels like she's making a deliberate choice, like she's playing you against each other.

But watch what happens when you zoom out and look at the full context:

What's your state during these mealtimes?
Tense. Rigid. Holding specific expectations about how she should be eating. Triggered by sounds and mess. Body tight. Emotionally activated.

What's your partner's state?
Calm. Relaxed about the sounds and mess. Not triggered. Body loose. Emotionally neutral.

Now ask yourself: If you were a young child with a still-developing nervous system, where would you naturally gravitate?

Toward the calm. Away from the tension.

Not because you're scheming. Not because you're trying to hurt anyone or create division. But because calm feels safer to a nervous system that's already working hard to manage the complexity of eating, sensory input, and social dynamics.

One therapist put it this way to a parent in your exact situation: "So your daughter moves toward the calm, relaxed energy and away from the tense, rigid energy. From her perspective, is that manipulation-or is that just... seeking what feels safer to a young nervous system?"

The parent's response: "Oh. Oh, that's... wow. When you put it that way, she's not splitting us on purpose. She's just going where it feels better."

What Happens When You Realize You're Splitting Yourselves

For months, maybe years, you've been operating from a belief: "She is splitting us."

Your daughter is creating division between you and your partner. She's playing you against each other. She's the source of the conflict about parenting approaches.

But what if you've had it backwards?

What if you and your partner are splitting yourselves with different approaches to her distress-and she's just responding to what she experiences?

You bring rigidity and tension to mealtimes. Your partner brings flexibility and calm. These aren't just different "parenting styles." They're different emotional climates. And your daughter isn't creating the split between those climates-she's just a young child moving between them, naturally gravitating toward the one that feels safer.

The thought "why don't you work with me?" reflects a real concern. Coparenting alignment matters. Research on coparenting quality consistently shows it affects children's social-emotional adjustment. Studies demonstrate that positive coparenting relationships-characterized by high cooperation, agreement, and low triangulation-are associated with fewer child behavior problems.

But here's the thing: the misalignment isn't created by your daughter's behavior. The misalignment is created by one parent interpreting distress as manipulation (and responding with rigidity) while the other parent responds with calm.

When you change the lens from "she's splitting us" to "we're splitting ourselves," everything shifts:

- The problem isn't her behavior to be corrected
- It's your differing interpretations and responses
- The solution isn't to get your partner to match your rigidity
- It's to address the attribution error driving your rigidity in the first place

One parent had this exact realization mid-conversation: "My rigidity versus my partner's flexibility is creating two different experiences for her. She's not the problem-the disconnect between our approaches is. And my automatic thought that she's doing it on purpose has been keeping me stuck in anger instead of addressing the actual issue."

How to Test Your Attribution Using Your Body

There's a simple way to test whether you're caught in an attribution error:

Notice what happens in your body when you think: "She's manipulating us."

For most parents, it's immediate: Righteous anger. Tightness in the chest or jaw. A feeling of needing to correct this, stop it, teach her she can't do this. The whole body goes rigid.

Now notice what happens when you think: "She's seeking calm because mealtimes feel overwhelming."

Different, right?

For many parents, this thought produces sadness instead of anger. Maybe some shame that you've been the source of tension she's trying to escape. Definitely less body tightness.

The sadness and shame are uncomfortable. But they're actually signs that your perspective is expanding beyond the anger-induced tunnel vision.

As one parent put it: "The anger felt more comfortable because it kept me certain and focused outward." Focused on her behavior. Her choices. Her manipulation.

The compassionate interpretation-she's struggling, she's seeking safety-requires you to look at your own contribution. That's harder. But it's also the only interpretation that leads somewhere productive.

What Research Shows About Attribution Errors

If you're still holding onto the possibility that your interpretation is correct-that she really is doing it on purpose-the research on this is unambiguous:

Studies on parental attributions show that believing children are intentionally misbehaving doesn't just affect your thoughts. It affects:

1. Your emotions toward your child - Attributing internal, stable, and intentional causes to misbehavior elicits negative parental feelings and expressed hostility toward the child

2. Your parenting behaviors - These attributions predict harsher parenting and more problematic parenting overall

3. Your child's actual outcomes - Research has found that mothers' pre-treatment parental attributions uniquely predicted severity of conduct problems at post-treatment and follow-up assessments

4. The parent-child relationship quality - These attributional patterns impact the emotional quality of the relationship in ways that persist over time

And here's what makes this relevant to your fear about "future consequences": The attribution pattern itself is creating the future you're afraid of.

Research on hostile attribution bias-the tendency to attribute hostile intent to ambiguous behaviors-shows that children exposed to harsh parenting are more likely to develop this same pattern. In other words, when you interpret your daughter's behavior as intentional manipulation and respond accordingly, you're teaching her to interpret other people's behavior through the same distorted lens.

The good news? These patterns are changeable. Clinical trials of attribution-focused interventions have successfully reduced hostile attribution bias in parents, with measurable improvements in both parent and child behavior. Evidence-based programs have shown that when parents change their attributions, children's behavior problems decrease-not because the parents became more strict, but because the parents became more accurate in their interpretations.

How to Interrupt the Cycle Next Time

You're not going to perfectly reframe every mealtime interaction starting tomorrow. That's not how changing automatic thought patterns works.

But you can start interrupting the cycle.

Next time you notice that automatic thought-"She's doing it on purpose"-here's your intervention:

1. Pause. Even just one second. Catch the thought before it becomes the action.

2. Take one breath. Not deep breathing, not a whole meditation. One breath to create space between the thought and your response.

3. Ask yourself: "What might she be struggling with right now?"

Not "What is she trying to accomplish by manipulating us?"

But "What might be hard for her in this moment?"

4. Reframe: From "she's manipulating" to "she's seeking calm" or "she's overwhelmed."

5. Notice the shift in your body. Is there less tension? Less anger? More space for curiosity?

6. Consider: What would it look like to match your partner's calm energy instead of expecting your partner to match your rigidity?

This isn't about never having boundaries at mealtimes. It's about having boundaries that come from accurate understanding instead of misattribution.

You successfully practiced this exact skill in a different context this week: When you were feeling unwell and in pain, you let go of your "always showing up for people" pattern. You gave yourself permission to rest. You voiced your struggles to your partner instead of pushing through.

You extended compassion to yourself when you were struggling.

Your daughter's difficult mealtime behaviors? That's her version of struggling. What you're learning is that the same skill applies:

Notice the automatic pattern ("I must push through" / "She's doing it on purpose")
↓
Name what's actually happening ("I'm in pain and need rest" / "She's overwhelmed and seeking calm")
↓
Choose something more compassionate and accurate instead of just reacting

It's all the same skill. You're just applying it in a new context.

What Changes When You See Her Seeking Safety

One parent said something that captures what's at stake here:

"I don't want her to feel like I'm constantly seeing her as an adversary. I want her to feel safe with me the way she feels safe with my partner. This attribution thing-it's been poisoning how I show up with her."

That's exactly right.

When you change the attribution from "she's manipulating us" to "she's seeking safety," you're not just changing a thought. You're changing:

- The emotional quality of your relationship - Research shows that these attribution patterns directly affect how you feel toward your child and how your child experiences you

- What behaviors you reinforce - When you see her moving toward your partner as "seeking calm" instead of "choosing against you," you can address the real issue (your rigidity creating tension) instead of punishing her for a normal response

- Your child's developing attribution patterns - You're modeling how to interpret ambiguous behavior with compassion instead of hostility, which affects how she'll interpret behavior throughout her life

- The coparenting dynamic - When the issue becomes "how do we both create calm" instead of "why won't you back me up on discipline," you and your partner can actually collaborate instead of splitting

The work isn't to become perfect. It's to catch the pattern once. Then twice. Then more often.

To notice the moment when anger creates that feeling of absolute certainty-and recognize it for what it is.

Not clarity.

A blind spot, lit up so brightly you can't see anything else.

---

What's Next

Stay tuned for more insights on your journey to wellbeing.