Your grandmother just passed away. You're grieving, you're exhausted, and the exposure homework you were supposed to do-looking at pictures of vomit, tackling the dirty laundry pile-feels impossible. You kept up with your existing exercises, the ones you'd already been practicing for weeks. But you couldn't push yourself to try anything new.
And now you feel like you're failing at therapy on top of everything else.
Before you spiral further into that thought, I need to tell you something: you're looking at your progress through the wrong lens. There's a piece of the exposure therapy puzzle that almost nobody talks about, a shift in understanding that changes everything, and a mechanism working behind the scenes that most people never learn about.
Let me show you what's actually happening.
The One Factor Everyone Overlooks in Exposure Therapy
Almost every article about exposure therapy, every OCD treatment plan, every therapist's explanation focuses exclusively on moving up your hierarchy-graduating from writing the word to looking at pictures, from touching one piece of laundry to handling a full load. Progress means climbing the ladder.
But there's a critical stability factor they're completely overlooking: what you maintain during life's hardest moments tells you more about your commitment than what you advance during easy weeks.
Think about what actually happened over the past two weeks. Your grandmother died. Research shows that major life stressors like bereavement don't just make you sad-they actively worsen OCD symptoms. The International OCD Foundation is clear about this: "When grief is added to the mix, it can exacerbate OCD symptoms, making it even harder to cope." Your brain is dealing with loss, processing grief, managing the stress response that comes with bereavement.
And in the middle of all that? You maintained your baseline exposures. The exercises you'd been practicing for a while-you kept doing them.
Most people would let everything slide. Most people would say "I'll get back to it when things calm down." The fact that you held steady isn't absence of progress-it's evidence of something much deeper. You didn't abandon ship during the storm. You kept your hands on the wheel.
This forgotten factor-the difference between maintaining during stress versus advancing during stability-can determine whether someone stays engaged with treatment or drops out entirely. Studies on ERP show that high attrition rates are one of the biggest challenges, despite the treatment's proven effectiveness. People quit. They get discouraged. They feel like they're not making progress fast enough.
But you didn't quit. You held the line. That's not nothing. That's the foundation everything else is built on.
Why Everything You Thought About Habituation Is Wrong
Here's where your whole understanding of exposure therapy is about to shift.
For years, most people with OCD have believed that exposure works by making you feel calm. You do the exercise-spell the word "vomit," touch the dirty laundry-and stay with it until your anxiety goes down. Until you feel relaxed about it. That's how you know it worked.
I used to think this too. So did a lot of therapists, honestly. It's the old habituation model: exposure works by habituating you to the fear until it fades.
But research over the past decade has discovered something completely different: exposure therapy works through new learning, not anxiety reduction.
Let me say that again because it's counterintuitive: you do not need to feel calm during an exposure exercise for it to be effective.
The landmark research by Craske and colleagues (published in peer-reviewed literature and now considered foundational to modern exposure therapy) found that "some people's OCD symptoms improve with exposure therapy in the absence of habituation, meaning that although habituation is common during exposure therapy, it is not as straightforward as once thought."
What this means is that every time you spelled "vomit" in large text and felt anxious the whole time? That was still working. Your brain was still learning. The exercise wasn't failing just because you didn't reach a calm state.
This completely changes how you should approach your exposure practice. The goal isn't to achieve zen-like peace while looking at vomit pictures. The goal is to give your brain the opportunity to learn something new: "I can be anxious about this AND nothing catastrophic happens."
Suddenly, all those exercises you thought you were "doing wrong" because you stayed anxious? You were actually doing them right.
The Hidden Mechanism Behind How Exposure Actually Works
So what's actually happening during exposure if it's not just anxiety wearing off? What's the invisible process making this work?
Here's the mechanism most people never see: exposure therapy doesn't erase your fear associations-it creates new, competing associations that your brain can choose instead.
Researchers call this inhibitory learning. Think of it like this: when you've had emetophobia for years, your brain has a strong, well-worn pathway that says "vomit = danger, must avoid at all costs." That pathway doesn't disappear just because you do some exposure exercises.
What exposure does is build a second pathway right alongside it: "vomit-related stuff + no actual vomiting = I'm safe even when anxious." Over time, with repetition, this new pathway gets stronger and stronger. Your brain starts defaulting to the new learning instead of the old fear.
But-and this is crucial-the old pathway is still there. That's why anxiety can pop back up sometimes, especially during stress (like, say, when you're grieving). The fear didn't come back because you failed. The fear was always there. What happened is your brain temporarily defaulted to the old pathway because you're under intense stress.
This is the hidden process behind why graded exposure works so well for contamination-based OCD and emetophobia. A 2023 study on contamination fear found that "creating a hierarchy enables a gradual, manageable approach, with exposure tasks organised in a stepwise manner promoting success experiences and reducing dropouts."
Each small step-spelling the word, then writing it larger, eventually looking at pictures-gives your brain another opportunity to build that new pathway. You're not climbing a ladder to escape fear. You're laying down neural tracks for a different route.
And here's what this means for your dirty laundry situation: when you avoid putting the washing in the machine because it might touch other surfaces, you're strengthening the old pathway. Your brain learns "I avoided it and nothing bad happened, therefore avoidance keeps me safe."
Research from 2024 shows that nearly 60% of OCD patients use avoidance as their main strategy, and it predicts worse long-term outcomes. Avoidance isn't just maintaining the problem-it's actively making it worse because you never get the chance to build the new pathway.
But when you touch one piece of dirty laundry and let it contact one surface without immediately cleaning? You're giving your brain new data: "Contact happened, no catastrophe occurred, I can tolerate this feeling." That's the engine running underneath. That's what creates lasting change.
How to Apply This to Your OCD Recovery Right Now
So let's connect all of this to where you are right now.
You're dealing with two exposure targets-the vomit-related hierarchy and the contamination concerns around laundry. You're also processing grief. And you have spring travel plans that are creating motivation to address these concerns before they limit your trip.
Here's what you now understand that you didn't before:
First: Maintaining your baseline exposures during bereavement isn't treading water-it's keeping your new learning pathways active during a period when your brain is under siege. That stability is valuable.
Second: You don't have to achieve calm during your exposure exercises. When you spell "vomit" in large text and feel anxious the whole time, that's still effective exposure. Your brain is still building the new pathway that says "I can be anxious about this word and nothing happens."
Third: Starting small with the laundry exposure isn't weakness or avoidance-it's strategic. Research on emetophobia treatment (which is understudied compared to other anxiety disorders) shows that a minimum of 15+ sessions is needed for moderate to high anxiety. "If the number of sessions is limited, ERP is less likely to be effective and maybe counterproductive."
You have time before your spring trip. You have time to build both pathways-the vomit-related learning and the contamination-related learning. The plan you made with your therapist (keep spelling "vomit" in large text several times, try the touch-one-piece-of-laundry exercise once or twice) isn't settling for less. It's working with how your brain actually learns.
The integration point is this: you're not trying to eliminate anxiety, you're trying to build tolerance for it. Every small exposure, whether you feel calm afterward or not, deposits another piece of evidence in your brain's "I can handle this" account.
The Research That Proves Anxiety Doesn't Have to Disappear
You might be thinking: "This sounds good in theory, but does it actually work when anxiety doesn't go down?"
Let me stack the evidence for you.
Research confirmation: Multiple meta-analyses, including Song et al.'s 2022 review of 30 studies, found that ERP had significant effects on OCD compared to placebo or pharmacological treatment alone. This research looked at actual symptom reduction, not just whether people felt calm during exposures.
The contamination-specific data: A 2023 study comparing different exposure approaches for contamination fear found that graded hierarchical exposure delivered similar outcomes to random variable exposure-but with one key advantage. The graded approach "promotes success experiences and reduces dropouts." Translation: starting small keeps you in the game long enough for the new learning to stick.
The inhibitory learning validation: The most influential paper in modern exposure therapy (Craske et al., 2014) definitively showed that "fear associations don't disappear; rather exposure therapy leads to the learning of new non-threat (inhibitory) associations that compete with older threat associations." This wasn't a small study or a fringe theory. This reshaped how we understand exposure therapy mechanisms.
The avoidance prediction data: 2024 research found that behavioral avoidance doesn't just maintain OCD-it predicts relapse. "Change in avoidance post-treatment to 3 months predicts worsening at 12 months." The people who reduced avoidance had better outcomes a year later, even if their anxiety was still sometimes present.
The grief-OCD interaction: The International OCD Foundation documents that "living with OCD while navigating grief becomes more complicated as intrusive thoughts amplify difficult emotions" and that "during grief, OCD symptoms commonly worsen due to stress." Your difficulty with new homework during bereavement isn't a personal failing-it's a documented, normal response.
The disgust factor in contamination OCD: Research shows that contamination-based OCD involves more disgust than fear or anxiety, which is why it feels different from other phobias. This validates why your dirty laundry concern feels qualitatively different from the vomit fear-they're engaging different emotional systems.
Every piece of this evidence points to the same conclusion: exposure works through repetition and new learning, not through achieving calmness. Starting small isn't compromising-it's following what the research shows actually works.
The Simple Test to Prove This Is Working for You
Here's how you can verify this for yourself over the next couple of weeks.
Pick your exposure exercise-let's say spelling "vomit" in large text. Before you do it, notice your anxiety level. Then do the exercise. Stay with it for however long you planned (maybe 2-3 minutes of looking at what you wrote).
Here's the key: don't wait for your anxiety to drop before ending the exercise.
Instead, notice what happens versus what doesn't happen. You spelled the word. You looked at it. Did you vomit? Did anyone around you vomit? Did thinking about the word make vomiting more likely?
No. None of those things happened.
That's the new learning. That's what your brain is recording: "I was anxious, I did the thing, the feared outcome didn't occur."
Now here's the test: Do this same exercise three or four more times over the next week. Don't aim for feeling calm. Aim for repetition. Each time, notice: anxiety present? Yes. Feared outcome? No.
After a week of this repetition, check in with yourself. You might still feel anxious when you write the word. That's normal-remember, the old pathway is still there. But ask yourself: Is it slightly easier to start the exercise? Do you hesitate a bit less? Does the anxiety feel slightly less sticky?
Those small shifts are evidence that the new pathway is forming.
You can run the same test with the laundry exposure. Touch one piece of dirty washing. Let it contact one surface (maybe a doorframe or a counter). Don't clean it immediately.
Anxiety: probably high. Disgust: probably high. Feared outcome (catastrophic contamination spreading uncontrollably): did it happen? No.
Your brain just logged that data.
Do it again in a couple days. Same test. Anxiety present, outcome doesn't match the fear. After three or four repetitions, notice if the urge to immediately clean that surface is exactly as strong as the first time, or if there's even a 5% reduction in urgency.
That's your evidence. That's how you prove to yourself that exposure is working even when you're still feeling anxious.
What Becomes Possible Once You Stop Waiting for Calm
Once you verify that new learning is happening-that you can do exposure exercises without reaching calm and still make progress-a whole different question opens up.
If your brain can build new pathways that compete with old fear associations, what else becomes possible?
You mentioned spring travel plans. Right now, you're motivated to handle laundry in a hotel or hostel without it ruining your trip. That's a clear, concrete goal. But if you successfully build the new pathway around contamination-if you can touch dirty washing and let it contact surfaces without immediately cleaning-you're not just solving the laundry problem.
You're proving to yourself that you can learn to tolerate distress in service of what matters to you.
That's a transferable skill. That's what opens up the possibility of tackling other avoided situations. That's what makes the difference between managing OCD and living a life that keeps shrinking.
The same goes for the emetophobia work. Right now you're at spelling the word in large text. Eventually, you'll look at pictures. Maybe months from now, you'll be able to watch a video clip. Not because your fear disappeared, but because you've built such a strong competing pathway that your brain defaults to "I can be anxious about this and nothing bad happens."
What becomes available after you verify this process is working isn't just symptom reduction. It's agency. It's the felt sense that you can do hard things even when they feel terrible. It's the knowledge that your OCD doesn't get to make the decisions about your life-you do.
And here's what else: you've already started proving this. You maintained your baseline exposures during grief. You didn't let bereavement erase weeks of work. That's evidence that you can hold steady when life gets hard.
Now you're adding small steps on two fronts: vomit hierarchy and laundry contamination. You're not rushing. You're not demanding that you feel calm. You're just giving your brain repeated opportunities to learn something new.
That's not just managing OCD. That's building a foundation for the kind of freedom you described when you talked about your spring trip-being able to travel without these worries taking over, handling laundry without it consuming your mental energy, seeing a version of yourself who's freer.
That version isn't years away. That version is being built right now, one small exposure at a time, anxiety and all.
What's Next
Stay tuned for more insights on your journey to wellbeing.
Comments
Leave a Comment